Wednesday, January 28, 2009

How To Put Nail Stencil

or non-astronomical photography

Stacking Stacking or non-astronomical photography. Find

bit of this on the web and / or books so I put together this petit tutorial to see what comes out of our own experiments.

The stacking technique comes from the world of astrophotography but can be used in conventional photography, basically consists of taking "No" photos of the same scene and then combine with layers (layers) with any photo editor. Already

to pull only 1 photo and copy "n" times is not the same and that does not achieve anything because the picture is the same with everything in place including noise.

Each layer is assigned a level of transparency so that together all the layers acts like a single picture.

The transparency of the layer "n" is simply calculated as 1 / N. If you have 5 layers of transparencies from the bottom up are:

1 / 5 = 20% (top layer)
quarter = 25%
1 / 3 = 33%
1 / 2 = 50%
1 / 1 = 100% (bottom layer)

For what use is it? See that things are accomplished:

- You get a similar result to a long exposure without the need for filters, water and clouds take the effect of prolonged exposure
- You can also get the effect of "stroke" with stars in night photography without the noise that would have a very long exposure. (You have to take lots of pictures course)
- noise is reduced to a minimum as the noise is random in each exposure by combining all the same is naturally filtered without degrading the image quality
- With plenty of pictures we can eliminate objects moving as people and cars

In situations where an exhibition long is difficult because people are crossing, things can move and take other "n" pictures at times is conducive to the scene and then combine them.

For cameras that are not so "bulb" can be replicated with this technique shows much longer than what the camera allows.

during the day can be used to emulate long exposures at night and can be used to avoid noise naturally.

Example: Taken

Lujan no filters to test the effect of the source, pull out a total of 12 photos, Lito and others who passed through there disappeared.

To deepen an explanation of how noise is reduced with this technique:
Noise Reduction By Image Averaging

Hello everyone!

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

What Would Rimadyl Do To A Human If Taken?

Tilt & Shift Miniatures

Tilt & Shift Miniatures type

The idea of \u200b\u200bthis tutorial is to present different ways to create images that have the appearance of miniatures, models, or models.

This effect is typically achieved through the manipulation of the DOF (depth of field) of the photo so that only a sliver of the picture is in focus with the rest desenfocado.Esto, along with an aerial perspective gives the feeling of watching a scale model rather than an actual photo.

Photo taken with a lens Arsat MC 80mm Tilt & Shift, manufacturing Russian and affordable price this is a very good lens for photo product or here to create thumbnails.












We will present three ways to achieve this effect:

  1. Using a Tilt & Shift lens
  2. For
  3. software using a web site using
Tilt & Shift lens

This option is the simplest and purest of all it is with which we achieve the effect of perfectly without any mistakes in the way we created the selective blur.


Tilt & Lenses Shift has the feature of being able to move in 3 planes can rotate, can be tilted to one side or another a certain amount of degrees (tilt) or can move to one side or the other (shift).

These moves allow you to manipulate the lens focal plane of a very broad and are widely used in architecture, landscaping and other areas to control the DOF, perspective or even to make panoramic shots. On another occasion, in time, we'll talk again of using these lenses, for today only use them to thumbnails.

To make a model with a T & S lens we use the tilt mechanism of the lens, and use it in an aerial view photo, see how the area in focus is reduced to a strip to be steeper smaller or larger lens tilt angle we use. By trial and error you can reach the DOF necessary to take the picture that we already have a good sense of layout.

After the photo is processed and for that we can use method 2 skipping steps in which imitates the operation of the tilt & shift lens.


software emulation
There are many web tutorials on how to create thumbnails tilt & shift, can google for more information about it, here is the basic method on this occasion using Gimp. In Photoshop should be equal to the minimal differences on nomenclature and interfaces between the two programs.

Step One: The photo



















We need a picture that is appropriate to apply the effect, overall aerial photos are appropriate but we try another type although the effect is not always good in any photo.

In this case we start with a photo of Honolulu Harbor taken from a tower.

first thing we do is duplicate the layer.
















About

layer Duplicate apply a blur, you can use the gaussian blur or otherwise, in gimp is a plugin called focus blur that works very well, we applied to the upper layer to make an image out of focus.




















now have the top layer out of focus and the bottom layer in focus, what remains is to bring up the bottom layer in the strip or area that we focus. To do this we add a mask and then use a gradient of bi-linear type to create a black strip that fades to white.




















The result is something like:




















As we see the effect is taking shape. One advantage of using two layers is that if we can, with a brush, work on the mask to selectively sharpen or blur different parts of the picture, you can make many fine adjustments as necessary to obtain a result that pleases us.

The last step is to make some adjustments on the final image, these also serve as settings for images taken with a tilt & shift lens to increase the look plastic / metal photo and that seems more a model what we do is:

  • saturation
  • Increase Increase Increase brightness
  • a
little contrast
The result in this case was as follows:



















Using a Web site


Finally if we are not take us all this work we test a web site called Tiltshiftmaker and allows you to upload a photo and apply the effect tilt & shift, the results are sometimes great but not always as good as what we can achieve by hand.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Buy Wooden Fingerboard

hyperfocal distance

hyperfocal distance

The landscape photography is often desirable that all our photo is sharp. Contrary to what happens in the portraits in which it is desirable the subject in focus and the background out of focus, in a landscape become a blurred background usually pretty bad.

The area of \u200b\u200bthe photo that is sharp or in focus is what is called DOF (depth of field) or English depth of field.

We affirm that in portraits usually work with depth of field (DOF) minimum and maximum DOF landscapes (in general)

What we want to photograph a landscape is to find such depth of field that extends from where we start our photography to infinity. The distance from which we have clearly to infinity is what hyperfocal distance call.

DOF depends on the selected aperture, the more open the aperture the greater the DOF which could lead us to think that just might get in F32 and have the maximum DOF possible for our lens, however, by the phenomenon of diffraction of very Fs markedly impair high image quality, usually in the normal lens of a DSLR openings between f5.6 and f11 are the optimum in terms of sharpness, f16 often barely usable, and from there the diffraction generates a noticeable drop in image quality. In general the optimum point (sweet spot) of a lens in terms of sharpness is between f5.6 and f10.
The aim is then to find which is the maximum aperture (smaller F possible) to achieve the hyperfocal distance.

hyperfocal distance is calculated:

H (mm) = (f * f) / (N * c) Where


f = lens focal length [mm]
N = F-Stop
c = 0.02 mm (size of the circle of confusion which we will not talk)

Example
If you are using a 35mm lens at F8

H = 35mm * 35mm / 8 * 0.02mm H = 7656 mm


words, our hyperfocal distance is 7.6 meters which means that with the 35mm lens at F8 can draw a focus to infinity as long as there is nothing relevant to less than 7 meters from the camera.

usually a good idea to put together a little board with the hyperfocal distance for different openings of the lenses we use. This can be done by visiting this site where we can also read more about the subject.

The planchette should have for their lenses have different focal lengths which is the hyperfocal distance in the most common openings: f2.8, f4, f5.6, f8, f11, f16 (emergency use)

When assembling these tables and play with the formula we learned learn quickly some practical conclusions:

- Sometimes a function of selected lens opening to use for a given scene, sometimes a function of the scene select the lens, the table and the formula used for both.
- The ultra-wide angle of 10 to 17mm are usually in almost hyperfocal distance for any open and distance, for example F8 hyperfocal distance is about half a meter in 10mm.
- long telephoto lenses over 60mm are very useful in landscaping but should be used when the scene begins at a good distance from the camera, so they are ideal for outlines, detail of mountains, cliffs, etc. Are not practical if we object near the camera to be appear in the picture.

Consider a couple of practical scenarios

1) We have a 24mm lens and want to show a particular scene

In these cases we can calculate the hyperfocal distance at various openings and then compose based on what the lens allows. We can use either formula or tables.
For 24mm hyperfocal distances have the following:


f5.6 f4 = = 5m 7m
f8 = f11 = 2.5m 3.5m


We should then find compositions in which there is nothing less than 2.5 meters from the camera since in that case for the nearby object is in focus lose focus at infinity which is bad.

2) We are in a scene determined and want to choose which lens to use, we have a 17-55 and a 10-20

Suppose now that we have a composition in which we like to have an object at 0.9 meters from the camera and we want the focus extends from the object to infinity. Using Tables

see the various options we have for hyperfocal distance less than or equal to 0.9 meters. In 17-55

we could get in 17mm and F16 but the image quality would not be very good.
We're 10-20 and then to see that we can draw on 11mm F8 hyperfocal distance of 0.7 meters.

Conclusions:

A peck of hyperfocal distances for our lenses is a very important tool when deciding to draw landscapes allowing us to calculate the optimal aperture to use to make the entire landscape is properly crisp.

Friday, January 16, 2009

Woolite Harm He Washing Machine



This is a list of software for amateur photographers that I have collected just in case someone finds it useful to browse, most (not all) are free products and / or open-source. Are grouped by category:

Edition General

The Gimp (Free) - Photoshop for the poor, without falling into sophistication has almost all the tools needed to edit a photo and more. Fusion

Exhibition (No HDR)

enfuse GUI (Free) - Excellent and simple option to merge multiple exposures of the same scene.

Tufuse (Free) - Another good software to merge exposures and also have the option to make focus-stacking.

ZeroNoise (Free) - Another option for fusion of exhibitions.

HDR PhotoMatix

(Commercial) - Standard Practice for the creation of HDR images and tone-mapping. Qtpfsgui

(Free) - A highly recommended and free tool for creating HDRs and has several tone-mapping algorithms to achieve varying results.

Picturenaut (Free) - A Freeware quite interesting to create HDRs.

FDRTools There are a lot lighter, Dynamic HDR, Artizen, etc etc. Question of choosing one or more flavors. Panoramic



Hugin (Free) - A free software as good or better than all the commercials to create panoramas, has multiple projections to create or work with panoramic HDR and as if this were not enough can be used also to correct perspectives. Also serves to create the famous LittlePlanets . PTGui

(Commercial) - From the mejorcito commercial products in my opinion, creates panoramic practically from anything, has several projections and can automatically create a VR movie from a panorama Equirectangular.

deformity correction (of the photos, of course)

PTlens (Commercial) - An economical software that corrects all kinds of deformations of the lens and can also be used to correct perspective. Practically a standard.

RectFish (Commercial) - Other economic product that is used to correct deformities such Fisheye lens (fisheye).

Stacking and astrophotography

DeepSkyStacker (Free) - Excellent product for astrophotography based on multiple photos of the same area of \u200b\u200bsky.

Registax (Free) - Another excellent product for astrophotography and image stacking. Iris

(Free) - Another excellent software for astrophotography.

not ask me to choose, the truth that I use all three!

Focus Stacking

Helicon Focus (Commercial) - Excellent product to merge different cores on a single image in order to increase the DOF in pre-opening set. Can be used interchangeably for macros or landscapes (or other uses)

CombineZM (Free) - Equivalent to Helicon Focus but free, the interface is not as nice but as the results are equivalent.
RAW


ufraw (Free) - Standard Practice for conversion of RAW files, with all the necessary options for handling RAWs, batch mode and many other things.

RawTherapee (Free) - Another interesting free alternative to conversion of RAW files.

RawAnalize (Free) - Excellent software to analyze raw files from different cameras with absolutely any kind of processing.

Other

StereoPhotoMaker (Free) - Software for creating three-dimensional images from different techniques two pictures slightly displaced. 3d little glasses not required but can make you dizzy!

Histogrammar (Free) - Very good software for analysis of histograms.

Noiseware Community Edition (Free) - Excellent noise reduction software.

AndreaMosaic (Free) - Software to create a mosaic that represents an image from many different images. Have fun at times ...

Friday, January 2, 2009

Creamy Italian Dressing Ingredients

Software Extravaganza Tutorial Infrared Photography Focus Stacking

Infrared Photography Tutorial without gutting the camera. ( Updated on July 9, 2009 )




















Introduction


What we want is a picture in which the light is not visible light but infrared radiation reflected by objects in the scene. In general the largest and only source of infrared radiation is the sun, opaque objects reflect a certain part of this infrared radiation and that is what we captured with the camera. As infrared radiation is on the outside of the visible light spectrum the results we get can be quite surprising.

any camera in general is quite sensitive to infrared radiation because they have a filter that filters in front of the sensor largely (but not all!) Infrared radiation that comes with it. Some photographers who specialize in infrared photos they do is remove this filter and so the camera is converted into an IR camera.

The counterpoint is that the camera no longer fit to take normal photos so in general this is not very desirable.

In a normal picture the amount of infrared radiation received by the camera in comparison with very little visible light so that the IR filter of the camera is usually not too strict, since it need not be, and this is essential to use IR filters and take infrared photos.

Without the option to turn the camera left is to use an infrared filter, the filter is screwed in our lens and filters the visible light letting infrared radiation. This infrared radiation is going to run into the sensor IR filter so will need a long exposure to achieve a correct exposure. The better or more strict is the IR filter of the camera exposure longer necessary. For this reason, some sites say that this or that is best for infrared camera but the reality is that the only thing that varies is the exposure time, any DSLR is for infrared photography provided when we have the filter, tripod and long enough .

Filters ...

There are many infrared filters, the filters are identified by the frequency beyond which keep out the light.
700nm filter will filter all that is less than 700nm and let spend the rest.

What each filter passes we can understand about this little board:

  • 700nm: Quite visible light (red) and 720nm
  • Infrared (Hoya R72) Something visible and infrared light 760nm
  • : Just something visible and infrared light 830nm
  • : No visible light, infrared only 850 or masnm
  • : Pure infrared filtering more and more and more

average exposure times on a sunny day with an XTI for filters up mentioned are:
  • 700nm: 10 to 15 seconds
  • 720nm: 20 to 25 seconds
  • 760nm: 1 to 3 minutes
  • 830nm: 2 to 6 minutes
  • 900nm
  • : You can get 20 minutes (only makes sense in cases of forensic and other studies)

A pure infrared picture is totally black and white with 760nm filters or more photos will be strictly B & N. If you want pictures
color filter need to miss some visible light which will give us the color in the photo.

The big problem with the selection of filters

If we understood so here we need a filter to let some light pass visible and infrared rest the problem is that depending on the camera and the filter model we need can vary. If the filter is very clear too pass up the photo visible light and be exposed to visible light most filtered red and IR only slightly. If the filter is too dark a picture we all white and black.
vegetation is the key blue, which is the result of filtering the green with a red filter, if what we get is blue means that the original was green and that is not IR, visible light is!

When the filter is too clear:






























What we see is actually a photo taken with a dark red filter, ie visible light we are exposing filtered red. This produces effects that can be very beautiful but not doing infrared photography. Personally I believe we can take lots of photos interesting with this type of filters.

When the filter is too dark:





















What we see is pure infrared radiation captured by the sensor, nothing in this photo or a drop of visible light, so the picture is completely black and white. The exposure time is here very little, usually more than 2 minutes and it generates much noise and movement of anything that moves with the wind. If the B & N we like and we can deal with noise and movement to this type of filter is a good solution.

When the filter is right:





















What we see here is a mixture of visible and infrared radiation. The vegetation is white because that is the color when making the vegetation reflects infrared light, although most of the exhibition is based on reflected infrared light filter has missed "something" of visible light that provides the color in photo .

lenses and IR photography

Unfortunately not all lenses are suitable for infrared photography. With certain lenses refraction between the internal elements of the same produce the effect known as "hot spot" which is basically a very nasty stain in the center of the picture, as if that area had been exposed much more than the rest of the photo.

This problem can be corrected in PP but I do it is extremely annoying. The following link
can find a list of lenses that do not occur and that if they produce hotspots.

http://www.lensplay.com/lenses/lens_infra_red_IR.html

Among the most popular lenses the 28-135 and 50mm 1.8 mkII going very well in IR.

Exposure

generally putting the filter through the viewfinder does not see anything, with a day of sunshine and light of 700nm filter we get to see the scene between shades of red in the viewfinder but it would be an exceptional case.
IR professionals use a viewfinder accessory shoe mounted flash, sometimes get on ebay and used to compose the filter position. Mortals up without the filter and then screw the filter again.
Keep in mind that the focus on IR is a bit outdated with visible light bulb so it should take at F8 or F11 and focusing a little bit ahead of where we want the real focus, taking into account the opening girl and that the gap is little that brings very good general results. At f4 and below may need some pictures of trial and error to guess where do the normal focus to focus IR fit.

If we think a final photo in B & N it is best to expose for the green channel, for that we use the camera's histogram in RGB mode, we start with an exposure to a rule of thumb according to the filter you use and then adjust the exposure time for adequate exposure of the green channel. The red channel will blow and blue can be noisy. Then on the PP simply "delete" green and red channels and we have a picture B & N very acceptable.

For pseudo-color photos on the question is more difficult because if we take care not to over-expose the red channel we sub-state green and blue channels of the photo. "Right" is technically take 2 photos (or three) one for the red channel and one for green and blue and then combine these channels in the PP in a single photo. Those who by now have lost all the hair may simply seek a compromise in which green and blue channels have
some detail and red is not burned completely. Keep in mind that in general the red channel is the one who recorded mostly visible light and green and blue channels infrared radiation.

Be careful with the ISO as being blue and green channels underexposed in general there is plenty of noise in high ISOs this is magnified if you take just one picture is recommended to use the lowest ISO the camera. Whether to combine multiple exposures can be drawn in ISO400 or if the camera allows it to 800 without much trouble. Show

with Hoya R72 filter

The Hoya R72 is one of the most popular IR filter DSLRs without some important tips the results can be somewhat random.

Something fundamental to consider is that if we took the photo in RAW without setting a custom WB histogram we see in the camera will not be the real histogram jpg but the histogram generated with the incorrect settings of WB. Setear a custom WB is somewhat cumbersome so it is advisable to learn to portray the filter without touching the WB. The key is relatively simple: Over-exposed!.

If we take care not to over-expose the red channel we will end with a photo with 95% 5% visible light and IR light because the red channel capture mostly visible light. For a correct IR effect should be relatively well exposed green and blue channels with the WB to "auto." As a first effect we see that the red channel is absolutely burned disappearing even from Histogram. Do not despair because the histogram shows that the camera is not RAW but JPG WB has a wrong, when you set the WB in the RAW development will magically re-appear the red channel that provides some light visible to the photo.

times of exposure to full sunlight tend to be in 20 or 30 seconds with this filter.


Post-Processing

The post-processing of IR photography can be as simple or complex as you want.

The first step is to adjust the white balance, in general it is to select any area of \u200b\u200bthe photo that has targeted vegetation and adjust the corresponding goterito, as assumed that the vegetation in Infrared blank this usually works well well. Temperatures range around 2000K. For those who do not take in RAW
or may not have to adjust the WB in the chamber using a custom-shaped photo of some vegetation and white card. Drawing on RAW the white balance setting on the camera is not necessary, are just metadata.

Once set the white balance there are 2 decisions to make the first is if we leave the photo in pseudo-color or pass it to B & N. The second decision is about reversing the red and blue channels of the photo, many do, some do not and the truth of the Milanese is that it depends on how we like but the end result, but try not cost anything.

After all this is to adjust levels and / or curves because in the infrared world things are not like in the world of visible light and can achieve results by moving the curves particularly interesting. Finally

usually required noise reduction and sharpening selective areas want more sharp.

Conclusions: For

those seeking B & N filter can start with a good economic via ebay, you have to pay about 20 dollars and usually come without problems. Those seeking a bit of color will have to fall in the almighty Hoya R72 filter is somewhat more expensive. Remove RAW is essential as well as some experience in RAW and adjust reveal the white balance. The tripod is absolutely essential.

My humble set of experiments can be Infrared ( here )